Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi
30th December, 1879
– 14th April, 1950

Venkataraman (later to be known
as Ramana) was born 30th December 1879 at 1 a.m., in the
village of Tiruchuli, Tamil Nadu. The day of his birth was the
auspicious Arudra Darshan, which, according to Puranic legend,
commemorated the manifestation of Lord Siva on earth. Venkataraman was
the second of three sons born to Sundaram Aiyar and Alagammal, who both
belonged to the Saivite Brahmin caste that worshipped Lord Siva as the
Supreme Being. Sundaram Aiyar, of whom Ramana would later call a
‘towering presence’, was a self-made man who built up a large practice
as a pleader at the local Magistrate’s Court. The mother Alagammal, a
noble woman; was a devoted wife and loving mother.
Next to the family home was the Bhuminatha Temple[1],
and the young Venkataraman and his friends would sometimes play in the
temple’s open spaces or in its large exterior hall and at other times
would go outside the village to Koundiniya River to fly kites and sail
paper boats.
When Venkataraman was
twelve, the tragic death of his father, Sundaram Aiyar marked the end of
a carefree childhood as the family unit was split up and he was sent to
nearby Madurai to live with his paternal uncle, Subba Aiyar. There,
Venkataraman studied first at Scott’s Middle School and later at the
American Mission High School. Although he had a remarkable memory and
was highly intelligent, he spent little time on studies, preferring
instead to take part in sports such as wrestling and swimming. He grew
up as just an average boy. He was an indifferent student, not at all
serious about his studies. But he was a healthy and strong lad and his
school mates and companions were afraid of his strength. If some of them
had a grievance against him, they would dare play pranks with him only
when he was asleep. In this he was rather unusual; he would not know of
anything that happened to him during sleep. He could be carried away or
even beaten without his waking up.
A noteworthy event of his early life occurred in November 1895
when Venkataraman met a relative from Tiruchuli who was in an ecstatic
mood after returning from a pilgrimage to Arunachala. The boy asked him
where he had come from. The relative replied ‘From Arunachala’. The very
name 'Arunachala' acted as a magic spell on Venkataraman, and with an
evident excitement he put his next question to the elderly gentleman,
‘What! From Arunachala! Where is it?’ And got the reply that
Tiruvannamalai was Arunachala. On
hearing the word ‘Arunachala’ the young boy was thrilled with awe and
joy!
Referring to this incident the Sage says later on in one of his
hymns to Arunachala:
'Oh, great wonder! As an insentient hill it
stands. Its action is difficult for anyone to understand. From my
childhood it appeared to my intelligence that Arunachala was something
very great. But even when I came to know through another that it was the
same as Tiruvannamalai I did not understand its meaning. When, stilling
my mind, it drew me up to it, and I came close, I found that it was the
Immovable.'
Soon after the incident which attracted
Venkataraman's attention to Arunachala, there was another happening
which also contributed to the turning of the boy's mind to the deeper
values of spirituality. He chanced to lay his hands, on a copy of
Periyapuranam which relates the lives of the Saiva saints. He
read the book and was enthralled by it. This was the first piece of
religious literature he read. The example of the saints fascinated him;
and in the inner recesses of his heart he found something responding
favourably. Without any apparent earlier preparation, a longing
arose in him to emulate the spirit of renunciation and devotion that
constituted the essence of saintly life.
Then at the age of seventeen, on 21 August, 1896, a day much
like any other, Venkataraman had an experience of death that would
entirely change his life. That evening while sitting alone in a room on
the first floor of his house, he was suddenly seized with an
overwhelming fear of death. The fear so powerfully concentrated his mind
that he began an intense enquiry.
“The shock made me at once
introspective or ‘introverted’. I said to myself mentally: ‘Now death
has come. What does it mean? What is it that is dying? This body dies.’
I at once dramatized the scene of death. I extended my limbs and held
them rigid as though rigor mortis had set in. ‘Well, then,’ said
I to myself, ‘this body is dead. It will be carried to the burning
ground and reduced to ashes. But with the death of this body, am “I”
dead? Is the body “I”? This body is silent and inert, but I feel the
full force of my personality and even the sound “I” within myself –
apart from the body. So “I” am the spirit, a thing transcending the
body’. All this was not a mere intellectual process. It flashed before
me vividly as living truth.’
As Sri Ramana narrated this experience
later on for the benefit of his devotees it looked as though this was a
process of reasoning. But he took care to explain that this was not so.
The realization came to him in a flash. He perceived the truth directly.
'I' was something very real – the only real thing. Fear of death had
vanished once and for all. From then on, 'I' continued like the
fundamental sruti note that underlies
and blends with all other notes. Thus young Venkataraman found himself
on the peak of spirituality without any arduous or prolonged
sadhana.
There was noticed a complete change in the young boy’s life.
The things he had valued earlier now lost their worth. The spiritual
principles which he had ignored till then became the only objects of
attention. School-studies, friends, relations – none of these had any
more significance for him. He grew utterly indifferent to his
surroundings. Humility, meekness, non-resistance and other virtues
became his adornment. Avoiding company he preferred to sit alone,
absorbed in concentration on the Self. Every day he went to the
Meenakshi Temple and experienced exaltation standing before the images
of the Gods. Tears flowed from his eyes profusely.
“I would occasionally pray for
the descent of Grace upon me so that my devotion might increase and
become perpetual like that of the sixty-three canonized saints.[2]
Mostly I would not pray at all; but let the Deep within flow on and into
the Deep without. Tears would mark this outflow of the soul but not
betoken any particular feeling of pleasure or pain.”
About six weeks after his death
experience (Self-realization), Venkataraman’s elder brother, Nagaswami,
coming into the room and seeing his younger brother sitting in
samadhi, roused him and pointing to some school-books said, ‘Why
should one who behaves in this way, retain all this?’ Venkataraman
thought, ‘What my brother says is true, what business have I here now?’
and the thought of Arunachala, which had previously caused him such a
thrill, came to him.
Taking three rupees from money given to him to pay his
brother’s school fees, Venkataraman left a short unsigned note and
departed for the railway station.
“I have, in search of my father
and in obedience to his command, started from here. This is only
embarking on a virtuous enterprise. Therefore, none need grieve over
this affair. To trace this out, no money need be spent.
Your college fee has not yet
been paid. Rupees two are enclosed herewith.
Thus.”
Venkataraman detrained at
Villuparam (near Pondicherry) for food and thereafter decided to walk.
By sunset he arrived at Araiyaninallur Temple where he remained for
meditation and later went to the nearby village of Kilur. The next day
after pledging his earrings for four rupees he entrained for
Tiruvannamalai arriving before noon on September 1, 1896. Immediately he
went to the Arunachaleswarar Temple and it was there at the Ayyankulam
tank that Venkataraman tore his dress to make a kaupinam[3],
threw everything else away including his remaining money and his
Brahman sacred thread, and allowed a barber to give him a tonsure.
Venkataraman would spend about eighteen months within the
precincts of the ArunachaleswararTemple. To begin with he would sit in
some corner, motionless, not speaking to anyone. Around midday he would
leave the Temple to beg a little rice in town. As he did not even have a
bowl in which food could be placed, he simply held out his hands to
receive whatever was given. He would then eat, wipe his hands on his
hair and immediately return to the Temple compound.
Eventually he moved into an underground cell in the courtyard
of the first prakaram[4]
of the Thousand Pillared Mandapam[5]
of the Arunachaleswara Temple. The dark, sheltered spot was known as
Pathala Lingam and it was here that became his place of meditation.
Sitting in that dark, damp cell for hours at a stretch completely lost
in samadhi, his body developed sores and worms crawled out of his
raw flesh. Local urchins began to pelt him with stones. The intensity of
the Swami’s tapasya started to receive attention and it was at
this time that
Sri Seshadri Swamigal entered Venkataraman’s
life.
On leaving the precincts of the Pathala Lingam the young
Swami spent a few weeks near the Subramanya Shrine and then passed to
the adjoining Illupai flower garden. After spending a few days in the
vehicles room at the Arunachaleswarar Temple, the now named Brahmana
Swami[6]
moved to the Mangai Pillayar Temple, where he had his first constant
attendant, Uddandi Nayinar and Annamalai Thambiran. From the shrine he
moved to Guru Moortham where he spent the next eighteen months. While at
Guru Moortham a man from Kerala named Palani Swami joined him as his
permanent attendant. As days passed and as Ramana's fame spread,
increasing numbers of pilgrims and sightseers came to visit him. After
about a year's stay at Guru Moortham, the Brahmana Swami moved to a
neighbouring mango orchard.

Until this point the young
sage observed silence and never revealed his identity but due to the
persistence of devotees, he eventually identified himself as
Venkataraman – Tiruchuzhi. News spread and eventually an uncle arrived
from his native place to take him home but all efforts proved futile.
Mother Alagammal, refusing to accept her son’s decision arrived in
Tiruvannamalai with her eldest son, Nagaswami, and finally met up with
Venkataraman at Pavazhakunru. Day after day the mother and eldest
brother visited the young Swami and tried to influence him in various
ways. Finally her son wrote his reply on paper:
“The Ordainer controls the
fate of souls in accordance with their past deeds – their Prarabdha
Karma. Whatever is destined to happen will not happen. Whatever is
destined to happen will happen, do what you may to stop it. This is
certain. The best course therefore is for one to be silent.”
From that time onward, the
young Swami lived on the Hill, moving from one cave to another. After
living in the Mango Tree Cave, he went to the Virupaksha Cave, where he
was to live for sixteen years until 1916.
People soon started coming up the Hill to see him. In 1902 a
Government official named Sivaprakasam Pillai, with writing slate in
hand, visited the young Swami in the hope of obtaining answers to
questions long perplexing him based upon ‘How to know one’s true
identity’. The fourteen questions put to the young Swami led to the
first enunciation of the teaching that was based on the Sage’s own Self
discovery. It would come to be known as the doctrine of Self-Enquiry and
would eventually be published in book form under the title ‘Who am
I?’
In 1907 Kavyakantha Ganapati Sastri, known as Ganapati Muni, because of the
austerities he had been observing, came to visit the young sage.
Ganapati Muni had the title Kavya-kantha (one who has poetry at
his throat), and his followers addressed him as nayana (father).
He was a specialist in the worship of the Divine Mother, a brilliant Sanksrit scholar, a prolific
poet, and had already gathered a small group of disciples around him. He
had visited Venkataraman twice before, but he had not put any questions
to him, but during this visit he entreated the young Swami to enlighten
him as to the nature of tapas.
Finally breaking his silence Venktaraman, speaking in Tamil,
said to Sastri:
‘If one observes whence this
notion “I” springs, the mind is absorbed into that. That is tapas.
When a mantra sound is produced, the mind is absorbed into that.
That is tapas.’

Sastri, believing
that the Goddess Uma, whom he worshipped, had given this revelation
through Venkataraman’s instruction, at once composed five verses in
praise of young Venkataraman, and shortened the name of the young sage
to Ramana. The next day he wrote about the event to his family and
followers, requesting them to henceforth address the sage as Bhagavan
(because he had realized the Self), and as Maharshi or Great Seer
(because of the originality of his teachings). Henceforth Brahmana Swami
was to be known as Sri Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi.
In 1912 the Maharshi underwent a second death experience in the
company of a group of devotees. He was returning from a pond when
suddenly he felt unwell, and for about fifteen minutes showed the
symptoms of death. Unlike the first experience of death, this event was
not attended by any fear on his part, for his inner awareness of Being
continued undiminished throughout.
From that time on, he would manifest the kind of
supraconsciousness known as Sahaja Nirvikalpa Samadhi. This is a
state which the Maharshi simply described as a continuous fixation in
the Self with, at the same time, the full use of the thinking mind and
other normal faculties. Henceforth, the world would never again be shut
out from his awareness even while in meditation. Other people would no
longer disturb him and he would have no need to remain in seclusion for
he perceived the Self in everyone alike.
In 1916 mother Alagammal and her son Nagasundaram joined Sri
Ramana at Tiruvannamalai and followed him when he moved to the larger
Skandashram Cave, where Bhagavan lived until the end of 1922. The mother received training in
intense spiritual life. She donned the ochre robe, and took charge of
the Ashram kitchen. Ramana's younger brother, Nagasundaram, then became
a sannyasin, assuming the name Niranjanananda. Among Ramana's
devotees he came to be known as Chinnaswami (the younger Swami). In 1920
the mother grew weak and Ramana tended her with care and affection. Alagammal finally left the body on May 19th,
1922, whereupon Sri Bhagavan indicated that she had attained Liberation.
Her body was buried on the banks of Palitirtham, a tank at the foot of
the southern slope of Arunachala. After the Mother’s passing away
Bhagavan would often walk from Skandashram to her tomb, then in December
1922, he came down from Skandashram permanently and settled at the base
of the Hill.
In due course many devotees came to live in the presence of
Bhagavan and in this way the present Sri Ramana Ashram developed.
Perfect equality was the principle lived by Bhagavan in the Ashram. He
always sat among the devotees for meals and in the case of edibles and
treats offered to Him; everything would be equally distributed in his
presence. As well as human beings; cows, dogs, monkeys, squirrels and
peacocks enjoyed perfect freedom and full rights in the Ashram. The
doors of the Hall where Sri Bhagavan lived were open to all, day and
night.
In 1928 a young man, age 22, became the Maharshi's personal
attendant and given the name
Annamalai Swami.
His duties, as directed by Sri Ramana, were to oversee the ongoing
construction at the ashram; including the goshala (cow shed),
dining hall, dispensary and other various projects. A temple eventually
was raised over the tomb of the mother Alagammal and consecrated in
1949. As the years rolled by the Ashram steadily grew, and people from
India and throughout the world came to see the sage and receive His
help.
Maharshi consistently guided the seeker back to the source of
abiding happiness – one's own Self. His teachings are among the clearest
and most direct of the advaitic (non-dualistic) teachings
originating from India. Ramana taught that we exist as the Supreme Self
at all times and one needs only awaken to this reality by seeking the
source of the ego, or ‘I-thought’, and abide in the Self. He referred to
this method as Self-Enquiry.

Ramana always
encouraged people to live life in the most natural manner. There was no
question of engaging or disengaging in activity – all happens according
to destiny. The primary consideration is to be free from the
‘I-am-the-doer’ illusion. The path of Self-Enquiry liberates one from
the never-ending fear and disorder resulting from taking the ego to be
real. By becoming free of the ego-illusion, one experiences true freedom
and supreme peace. It is a path that takes one from the apparent duality
of the individual and the world to the bliss of one's real nature.
Through this awakening to Self-awareness, even by imperfect glimpses,
one begins to sense a Reality not limited to the ego's world. And, this
current of Awareness, is ultimately revealed as the Self – Pure
Consciousness.
Ramana's first Western devotee was thought to be
Frank H. Humphreys.
He came to India in 1911 to take up a post in the Police service at
Vellore. Given to the practice of occultism, he was in search of a
Mahatma. He was introduced to Ganapati Sastri by his Telugu tutor;
and Sastri took him to Ramana. The Englishman was greatly impressed.
Writing about his first visit to the sage in the International
Psychic Gazette, he said:
'On reaching the cave we sat before him, at
his feet, and said nothing. We sat thus for a long time and I felt
lifted out of myself. For half an hour I looked into the Maharshi's
eyes, which never changed their expression of deep contemplation.... The
Maharshi is a man beyond description in his expression of dignity,
gentleness, self-control and calm strength of conviction.'
Humphrey’s ideas of spirituality
changed for the better as a result of the contact with Ramana. He
repeated his visits to the sage and continued to record his impressions
in letters to a friend in England which were published in the Gazette
(mentioned above). In one of them he wrote, 'You can imagine nothing
more beautiful than his smile.' And, 'It is strange what a change it
makes in one to have been in his Presence!'
People poured into Maharshi's ashram as
his fame spread, fuelled by word of mouth and publicity generated by
books and articles of various supporters and authors.
Paul Brunton
(writer, mystic, and philosopher) is credited with opening up to the
West the experience and knowledge of Enlightenment. Other important
chroniclers were;
Julian P. Johnson,
W. Somerset Maugham and
Mercedes De Acosta.
Not only good people were
attracted to the Ashram. Sometimes bad ones turned up also - even bad
sadhus. Twice in the year 1924 thieves broke into the Ashram in
quest of money. On the second of these occasions they even beat Maharshi
after finding that there was little for them to take. When one of the
devotees sought the sage's permission to punish the thieves, Sri Ramana
forbade him, saying: ‘They have their dharma, we have ours. It is
for us to bear and forbear. Let us not interfere with them.’ When one of
the thieves gave him a blow on the left thigh, he told him: ‘If you are
not satisfied you can strike the other leg also’. After the thieves had
left, a devotee enquired about the beating, Ramana remarked, ‘I also
have received some puja’, punning on the word which means
'worship' but is also used to mean 'blows'.
Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi showed the same
consideration to animals (whom destiny had brought into contact with
him) as to the people – and animals were drawn to him just as people
were! Birds and squirrels would build their nests close to him and
mother monkeys were often seen to bring their babies to him for
blessings in the same way human mothers would bring their children.
Ramana never referred to animals in the usual Indian style as ‘it’ but
always as ‘he’ or ‘she.’ At meal time at the ashram the animals were
always fed first, then sadhus or beggars who might have chanced
by, and then the devotees. He referred to the ashram dogs as ‘the Lads’.
Many
animals found their way to the ashram including dogs, cats, cows,
peacocks, squirrels, birds and monkeys. Squirrels would hop through the
window of Ramana’s room and He always kept treats for them by his side.
The animals felt his Grace and he loved them in return.
Despite protests from his
followers, Ramana would not have the snakes that inhabited the ashram
grounds killed, as he felt it was the people who were the invaders, so
the homes of all the animals should be respected. He treated the
snakes with great respect and it was said no devotee was ever harmed by
one. Many animals would gather in the evenings when Bhagavan sat in the
hall. On occasions when Bhagavan would be delayed, the animals would
come to the hall and peer anxiously in the direction of his empty couch.
Bhagavan was very intimate with the animals especially the local monkeys
who considered him one of their own. Once Bhagavan and his devotees
walked farther than expected and had become hungry. Out of nowhere
appeared a band of monkeys who swarmed to the top of a high fig tree
shaking its branches so that all of the fruit dropped to the ground for
Bhagavan and his followers. The monkeys, taking no fruit for themselves,
left as quickly as they had appeared.

The most favored of all the animal devotees was a
cow named Lakshmi. She was brought along with her mother as a gift to
Bhagavan. As he felt the Ashram could not properly care for the cows,
they were taken to a farm in a neighboring village. After Lakshmi had
been with the farmer for more than a year, the man went one evening to
Ramanashram bringing Lakshmi and her mother with him for a visit.
Lakshmi was irresistibly attracted to Ramana and must have noted
carefully the way to the ashram. The next day she appeared on her own
and from then on came every day and returned, by herself, to her own
home in the evening. She soon became a permanent member of the ashram.
During her life, Lakshmi bore several calves at least three of them on
Bhagavan’s birthday. She was extremely devoted to Bhagavan and he showed
her the utmost Grace and kindness.
On June 17, 1948 Lakshmi became very ill
and it was clear her time had come. Bhagavan went to her and said: ‘Amma
(Mother), do you want me near you?’ He sat down and cradled her head in
his lap putting one hand on her head and one over her heart just as he
had done when his own human mother lay dying. He gazed into Lakshmi’s
eyes for a long time and lay his cheek against hers stroking her gently.
She focused all of her attention on Bhagavan and was conscious up to the
end, her eyes bright and clear. On June 18th at 11:30 am she left her
body peacefully. She was buried in the Ashram compound with full funeral
rights. Her grave is next to those of a deer, crow and dog also buried
by Bhagavan. A stone was placed over Lakshmi’s grave with her likeness
carved into it. On the stone was also engraved the epitaph he had
written for her stating she had attained (Mukti) final
liberation.
Life
in the Ashram flowed on smoothly. With the passage of time more and more
visitors came – some of them for a short stay and others for longer
periods. The dimensions of the Ashram increased, and new features and
departments were added – a home for the cattle, a school for the study
of the Vedas, a publication department, and the Mother's Temple,
within which worship was regularly conducted.
Ramana sat most of the time in the
Hall witness to all that happened around him. He was also active with
Ashram duties and used to; stitch leaf-plates, dress vegetables, read
proofs received from the press, look into newspapers and books and
suggest lines of reply to letters received. There were numerous
invitations for him to undertake tours but, he never left Tiruvannamalai,
and in later years, the Ashram.

From the day Ramana
set foot in Tiruvannamalai, he did not move away even for a moment but
lived there continuously for fifty-four years. In 1949 a lump began to
grown on the lower portion of his left upper arm. At first the lump was
very small but grew bigger after two operations, bleeding profusely and
continuously, and proving to be cancerous. All kinds of treatment were
tried, including radium application, but in vain. Even after the fourth
operation, which was done on December 19th, 1949, the disease
was not cured.
The sage was quite unconcerned,
and was supremely indifferent to suffering. As he sat, a spectator
watching the disease waste the body, his eyes shone as bright as ever;
and his Grace flowed towards all beings. Crowds came in large numbers
and Ramana insisted they should be allowed to have his darshan.
Devotees intensely wished the sage should cure his body through an
exercise of supernormal powers, but the Maharshi never exhibited even
the slightest interest in Siddhis.
Even during the period of great torture caused by the disease,
Bhagavan comforted the devotees whenever they were worried about this
health. He once remarked:
‘The body itself is a disease
that has come upon us. If a disease attacks that original disease, is it
not good for us?’, and remarked to another devotee lamenting over his
illness:
‘Oh! You are grieving as if
your Swami were going away? Where to go? How to go? Going and coming is
possible for the body, but how can it be possible for us?’
No-one was prevented seeing Him till the
very end which came at 8.47 p.m. on Friday April 14th, 1950.
Earlier that evening the sage gave darshan to devotees. All
present knew that the end was nearing and they sat singing Ramana's hymn
to Arunachala with the refrain Arunachala-Siva. The sage asked
his attendants to make him sit up. He opened his luminous and gracious
eyes for a brief while; there was a smile; a tear of bliss trickled down
from the outer corner of his eyes; and at 8-47 the breathing stopped.
There was no struggle, no spasm, none of the signs of death. At that
very moment, a comet moved slowly across the sky, reached the summit, of
the holy hill, Arunachala, and disappeared behind it.
[1]
Temple famous since medieval times for being celebrated in the hymns
of two Tamil poet-saints, Sundaramurti and Manikkavachakar.
[2]
This refers to the Periapuranam a collection of narratives on
the lives of sixty-three Saivite Saints.
[3]
Loincloth
[4]
Courtyard
[5]
A raised platform of stone covered over with an ornamental roof
supported by pillars.
[6]
Name can be translated as ‘Saint of the Absolute’.